Voyager Q |
![]() |
Product summary The good: The Voyager Q hard-drive-docking station supports both 2.5-inch and 3.5-inch SATA hard drives. It features a practical design, all the existing connections (USB, FireWire 400, FireWire 800, and eSATA), and performs very well in our tests. The bad: The Voyager Q doesn't support ATA (IDE) hard drives and comes with a bulky power adapter. The bottom line: The Voyager Q is a versatile hard-drive-docking station for people who work with more than one internal hard drive. It saves time and spares you from having to open the computer's case. Click HERE to view video CNET editors' review
Drive type: External hard-drive docking station Design and features On its front is a blue on/off button that doubles as its activity indicator and flashes red when the device is at work. Directly on top of the button is a release latch that ejects the hard drive when pressed. On the back of the device is an array of connection ports, supporting USB 2.0, FireWire 400, FireWire 800, and eSATA connections. The Voyager ships with cables for each of these connections. The only complaint we had with the Voyager Q's design is its power adapter, which, compared with the size of the Voyager, looks bulky. With the Voyager Q connected to our test machine, we linked several hard drives without any problems. There was no software driver to install, and every hard drive we tried could be "hot-plugged," meaning we could remove or insert it while the computer was running. Performance The eSATA connection, for example, gave us 426.32Mbps for the read test and 340.32Mbps for the write test. For comparison the Seagate FreeAgent Xtreme, one of our fastest eSATA external hard drives, ran at 439.52Mbps for the write test and 336.82Mbps for the read test. These scores are about the same as those you get from internal hard drives. This means you could potentially install the operating system on the external hard drive without compromising its performance. The Voyager also did very well with the other connections, except for the FireWire 800, which wasn't faster than the FireWire 400. However, we blame this on Windows XP, which we used for our test operation system, rather than on the Voyager because Windows XP has been known to not support the FireWire 800 connection very well. We suspect that performance on a Mac OS would be better.
Thanks to its fanless design, the Voyager Q also performed quietly and stayed cool during the testing process. Service and support
|
| The above article has been included on our site for archival purposes only. To see the article as it appeared in the original published form, click the link provided. All stories have been captured without modification to their content. |